There is a fundamental flaw in democracy that sits right before our eyes and yet strangely out of our conscious. We all see it, but none dare grasp it, as if it is some viciousness that is beyond redemption and we must endure it as an inevitability, something we bare as a burden in exchange for the “righteousness” of the whole. Or perhaps an embarrassment, like an uncle whose homosexuality is never mentioned, hoping against hope that if ignored long enough it might go away. Perhaps it escapes you, him, them and gay Uncle Bob; Perhaps I alone see it, perhaps I am the little boy who sees the emperor’s nakedness.
I find it ironic that civilized societies that have not only taken up the eradication of the marginalization and/or subordination of the lesser, but have also made this a fundamental pillar of their justice, would champion, nigh, go into battle to promote a system that not only purposefully creates a minority, but also goes on to marginalize them. In the most polite layman talk, the central tenet of democracy is simply ‘the majority is right, screw the rest’.
I think I might need glasses, because I seem to be the only one who sees the massive white elephant in the room.
‘But man has a natural human right to elect who leads him’ you say, triggering a deep and hearty laugh from me, because you make it so easy; ‘…and how about the rights of the minority that the process has created, what happened to their right to be led by a leader of their choice, why has that been revoked for no other reason than the fact that they are fewer in numbers?’
There are no natural rights, no rights ordained by divine law and if they did exist the unjust right to choose would certainly not be one of them. The reality is that that which we mistake for or purposefully mask as natural right is nothing but the remnants of our liberties, those that where not sacrificed for the security of living in a society. The unwritten pact of a societal existence is that everyone should be free to do whatever he/she desires as long as it does not impact on the freedom of another.
We wrap these liberties in a divinious shroud, because once this social pact breaks down, society will collapse. We are afraid that the punishment we mute out to violators of this pact is not deterrence enough, so we place them in a higher power; we make belief that God himself decreed them and that the violation of them will lead to eternal damnation by hellfire, this very same reasoning gives us the notion of right and wrong and the concept of sin. But I digress.
It seems to me that if you and Gay Bob get to choose who leads me and what laws will govern me, because there are two of you and only one of me, that you are seriously impacting my freedom. Don’t get me wrong, the right to choose is a violation of this social pact, not because it installs a leader – that is unavoidable, leaders will arise in society whether democracy is in place or not – but because some get to have their choice fulfilled and others get to endure someone they actively acted against, because someone else’s choice is forced upon an individual who did not want it for no other reason than that he stands with a few; that is injustice. It would be fairer to have no one choose and let he with ability assume leadership through talent and natural endowment.
The injustice is made even greater considering, in the words of Will Durant, that the masses are easily misled and fickle, in layman words; they are stupid. Think about it; most stupid things are done in the safety of numbers, the more you are, the more likely you are to commit crime, it is called mob psychology, the bigger the crowd the more stupid it gets. Perhaps that is because there are more stupid people in the world; maybe that is why no one seems to comprehend the latent injustice in this supposedly just system or the fact that it is based on a hopelessly ridiculous, so ridiculous that it is laughable, ideology of the most popular being the most capable to lead (see Barrack and Hillary tickle a dead Greek).
Whatever the reason, democracy has been championed so severely that it has become blasphemous to question it. It has become so ingrained in our culture that it has settled somewhere within our subconscious as something natural, like breathing and eating. In the process it has grown larger than its intent; democracy, like other forms of government (yes, there are others) is meant to be a means not an end. The end should always be the happiness of all the people.
Recent Comments